MSD Commited to bringing out the best in medicine
Contact UsWorldwide
   
Email Updates
Request More Information
Key Publications

Articles provided on this web site or which are linked to from this web site are owned by third parties and protected by copyright laws. Authorized users have permission to download, display, view, and print a single copy for their personal use for research and private study purposes. Any other use is prohibited unless permission is obtained from the copyright owner. Authorized users may not remove, alter, or modify any part of the article, including the authors' names and copyright notices.

OSTEOUPDATE NEWSLETTERS
OsteoUpdate Newsletter Volume 5 Issue 1
Dempster et al OsteoUpdate June 2003; Vol. 5 Issue 1
This issue of the OsteoUpdate Newsletter features expert commentary by David W. Dempster, PhD, on the impact of antiresorptive therapy on bone quality.
  View Publication   
OsteoUpdate Newsletter Volume 4 Issue 3
Fitzpatrick et al OsteoUpdate December 2002; Vol. 4 Issue 3
This issue of the OsteoUpdate Newsletter features expert commentary on the recently published series of systematic reviews, "Meta-Analyses of Therapies for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis," (Endocrine Reviews 2002) by one of the investigators, Dr. Lorraine Fitzpatrick.
  View Publication   
OsteoUpdate Newsletter Volume 4 Issue 2
Hochberg et al OsteoUpdate September 2002; Vol 4. Issue 2
This issue of the OsteoUpdate Newsletter features expert commentary on evidence demonstrating the extent to which changes in BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover relate to fracture risk reductions during treatment with antiresorptive therapies. A summary of a comprehensive review article examining clinical trials of therapies for osteoporosis is included, along with an evaluation of new investigational therapies. The issue also provides peer reviews of several current articles on osteoporosis diagnosis and management.
  View Publication   
FOSAMAX® CLINICAL DATA
Ten years' experience with alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer J-P, et al N Engl J Med 2004;350:1189–1199.

The 10-year efficacy and safety data for FOSAMAX have been accepted for publication in an upcoming issue of the New England Journal of Medicine! These landmark findings represent the longest study of a nonhormonal osteoporosis therapy conducted to date. The data were pooled from two identically designed, concurrent, three-year, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies that were extended for a total of 10 years. Authored by Henry G. Bone et al, this report presents the results from the 247 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who participated in all three study extensions.

Alendronate produces greater effects than raloxifene on bone density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone density: results of EFFECT (EFficacy of FOSAMAX versus EVISTA Comparison Trial) International
Sambrook PN, Geusens P, Ribot C, et al Journal of Internal Medicine 2004;255:503–511.

Alendronate produces greater effects than raloxifene on bone density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone density: results of EFFECT (EFficacy of FOSAMAX versus EVISTA Comparison Trial)

Putting Evidence-Based Medicine into Clinical Practice: Comparing Anti-Resorptive Agents for the Treatment of Osteoporosis
LE Wehren, D Hosking, MC Hochberg Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20[4].

This adjusted indirect comparison of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the Osteoporosis Methodology and Research Advisory Groups (OMG/ORAG) shows that FOSAMAX was significantly more effective than risedronate, calcitonin, estrogen, etidronate, and raloxifene in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures and was significantly more effective than calcitonin in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures. No other significant pair-wise differences were found among any of the active agents. Because head-to-head trials with fracture endpoints are not currently available, adjusted indirect comparisons represent the best and most clinically useful information for comparing the efficacy of different treatments for osteoporosis.

Validation and comparative evaluation of the osteoporosis
F Richy, M Gourlay, PD Ross, et al Q J Med 2004;97:39–46.

In this paper, the researchers evaluate the validity of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool (OST) and compare it with the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI), the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE), and the Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS) in identifying those women who are the most likely to have low BMD and are thus most in need of further diagnostic procedures and treatment. They found that "The OST, based only on age and weight, performed as well as the more complex risk assessment indices (SCORE, ORAI, and OSIRIS) in identifying women at low risk of osteoporosis who would not need DXA testing. Avoiding unnecessary testing among low risk patients can substantially reduce cost for the community and the patient."

Alendronate versus Calcitriol for the Prevention of Bone Loss after Cardiac Transplantation
E Shane et al N Engl J Med 2004;350:767–776.

This one-year, double-blind, double-placebo study compared FOSAMAX 10 mg daily and calcitriol 0.5 µg daily for the prevention of bone loss during the first year after cardiac transplantation in 149 patients. The study showed that when compared with patients in an untreated reference group, patients treated with FOSAMAX 10 mg had significantly less bone loss at both the spine and hip, whereas patients treated with calcitriol had significantly less bone loss at the hip only. The authors state that FOSAMAX 10 mg is the more attractive option for preventing bone loss early after cardiac transplantation because of the increased risk for hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria associated with calcitriol use./p>

Two-year results of once-weekly administration of alendronate 70 mg for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Alendronate Once-Weekly Study Group J Bone Min Res 2002; Nov;17(11):1988–1996.

In this 1-year extension of a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, the Alendronate Once-Weekly Study Group confirmed that FOSAMAX 70 mg Once Weekly is therapeutically equivalent to FOSAMAX 10 mg daily, "providing patients with a more convenient dosing option that may potentially enhance adherence to therapy."

Alendronate prevents loss of bone density associated with discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy.
Ascot-Evans B et al Arch Intern Med 2003;163:789–794.

The results of a randomized controlled trial indicate that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) discontinuation resulted in a significant loss in BMD at the lumbar spine. The study also showed that alendronate not only prevents the BMD loss associated with stopping HRT, but also produces significant increases in bone density at the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal women who stopped HRT.

Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatement of postmenopausal women.
A Cranney et al Endocr Rev 2002;23(4):508–516.

Ann Cranney et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of FOSAMAX in postmenopausal women. The 11 studies included in their analysis had a follow-up of at least 1 year and measured fracture incidence or change in BMD.

Meta-analyses of oteoporosis therapies show that FOSAMAX increases BMD and decreases fractures.
A Cranney et al Endocr Rev 2002;23(4):570–578.

In this review, Ann Cranney et al summarize the findings from seven meta-analyses of different treatments for osteoporosis.

Significant differential effects of alendronate, estrogen, or combination therapy on the rate of bone loss after discontinuation of treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
SL Greenspan et al Ann Intern Med 2002;137:875–883.

In this head-to-head trial that evaluated the residual effect of FOSAMAX, estrogen, or the combination of both on bone mass after discontinuation of therapy, the authors found that rapid bone loss ensued after stopping estrogen but not after stopping FOSAMAX, either alone or combined with estrogen.

Literature review shows advantages of FOSAMAX over other osteoporosis therapies.
HJ Hauselmann, R Rizzoli Osteoporosis Int 2003;14:2–12.

HJ Hauselmann and R Rizzoli analyzed data from 41 peer-reviewed published articles that reported on randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies of agents used in the treatment and/or prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Comparison of change in bone resorption and bone mineral density with once weekly alendronate and daily risedronate: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Hosking et al Curr Med Res Opin in press

This very important international trial demonstrated that FOSAMAX Once Weekly was significantly more effective than Actonel daily. Study results showed that FOSAMAX Once Weekly reduced bone resorption faster than risedronate and that after 1 year, patients taking FOSAMAX reported 70% greater increases in BMD at the lumbar spine compared with patients on risedronate, and a 3-fold greater increase in total hip BMD.

back to top
PrintPrint

Registered trademark of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA

FOSAMAX Bibilography
Click here to download the full FOSAMAX Bibliography
MEDLINE/PubMed
Click here to link to MEDLINE/PubMed
Privacy Policy Terms of Use Copyright Merck & CO., Inc. (USA) Disclaimer